Processing...
United Nations
Information Centre | Nepal
Home
News
Blog
Internship
Login
Saturday, February 15, 2025
Document History
Home
>
Document Service
>
Document History
Making Smaller Social Groups Visible and Providing a Baseline for Tracking Results on Social Inclusion: The Nepal Multidimensional Exclusion Index
Abstract:
This paper presents the methodology and first round results for a Multidimensional Exclusion Index (MEI) for social groups in Nepal. The MEI proposed in this paper provides a summary measure of exclusion (deprivation) in income, health, education and influence/agency dimensions. MEI is constructed using the multidimensional poverty measurement methodology proposed by Alkire and Foster (2007, 2009) (AF1). AF methodology has been applied notably in the newly introduced multidimensional poverty index (MPI) for the UNDP‟s 2010 Human Development Report, and other applications include Batana (2008) in Sub-Saharan Africa, Alkire and Seth (2009) in India, Yu (2008) in China, Santos and Ura (2009) in Bhutan, and Battiston et. al. (2009) in Latin America. The MPI Country Briefing series by Alkire and Santos (2010) includes Nepal. The Nepal MEI index is an intuitive and policy-relevant measure that is also technically robust, satisfying a number of desirable properties. MEI contributes to the measurement and understanding of multi dimensional welfare/deprivations in three distinct ways: i) MEI is calculated for eighty different caste/ethnic population groups in the country; ii) it conceptualizes and constructs the level of exclusion for a given social group as a reflection of deprivation opportunities in multiple dimensions of human well being: income, health, education and agency/influence; (iii) unlike the other multidimensional indices such as the HDI and the MPI, the MEI includes direct measures of income and influence dimensions. The details of the indicators and methodology used in the MEI Index are provided in section 3 of the paper.
Publisher:
UNDP
Type / Script:
Progress Report
in
English
Keywords:
SOCIAL GROUPS, ETHNICITY, SOCIAL CLASSES, CASTE, DALITS, SOCIAL STRUCTURE, POVERTY, INEQUALITY, DISCRIMINATION, INCOME, EMPOWERMENT, NUTRITION, HEALTH, EDUCATION, MALNUTRITION
Thematic Group:
UNDP
, (
2011
)
Thesaurus:
14.05.03
-
Social Development
PDF
| File Size:
1.73 MB
Download
Feeder:
LEELASHRESTHA
, Editor:
, Auditor:
...
Making Smaller Social Groups Visible and Providing a Baseline for Tracking Results on Social Inclusion: The Nepal Multidimensional Exclusion Index
Abstract:
This paper presents the methodology and first round results for a Multidimensional Exclusion Index (MEI) for social groups in Nepal. The MEI proposed in this paper provides a summary measure of exclusion (deprivation) in income, health, education and influence/agency dimensions. MEI is constructed using the multidimensional poverty measurement methodology proposed by Alkire and Foster (2007, 2009) (AF1). AF methodology has been applied notably in the newly introduced multidimensional poverty index (MPI) for the UNDP‟s 2010 Human Development Report, and other applications include Batana (2008) in Sub-Saharan Africa, Alkire and Seth (2009) in India, Yu (2008) in China, Santos and Ura (2009) in Bhutan, and Battiston et. al. (2009) in Latin America. The MPI Country Briefing series by Alkire and Santos (2010) includes Nepal. The Nepal MEI index is an intuitive and policy-relevant measure that is also technically robust, satisfying a number of desirable properties. MEI contributes to the measurement and understanding of multi dimensional welfare/deprivations in three distinct ways: i) MEI is calculated for eighty different caste/ethnic population groups in the country; ii) it conceptualizes and constructs the level of exclusion for a given social group as a reflection of deprivation opportunities in multiple dimensions of human well being: income, health, education and agency/influence; (iii) unlike the other multidimensional indices such as the HDI and the MPI, the MEI includes direct measures of income and influence dimensions. The details of the indicators and methodology used in the MEI Index are provided in section 3 of the paper.
Publisher:
UNDP
Type / Script:
Progress Report
in
English
Keywords:
SOCIAL GROUPS, ETHNICITY, SOCIAL CLASSES, CASTE, DALITS, SOCIAL STRUCTURE, POVERTY, INEQUALITY, DISCRIMINATION, INCOME, EMPOWERMENT, NUTRITION, HEALTH, EDUCATION, MALNUTRITION
Thematic Group:
UNDP
, (
2011
)
Thesaurus:
14.05.03
-
Social Development
PDF
| File Size:
1.73 MB
Download
Feeder:
LEELASHRESTHA
, Editor:
, Auditor:
...
Making Smaller Social Groups Visible and Providing a Baseline for Tracking Results on Social Inclusion: The Nepal Multidimensional Exclusion Index
Abstract:
This paper presents the methodology and first round results for a Multidimensional Exclusion Index (MEI) for social groups in Nepal. The MEI proposed in this paper provides a summary measure of exclusion (deprivation) in income, health, education and influence/agency dimensions. MEI is constructed using the multidimensional poverty measurement methodology proposed by Alkire and Foster (2007, 2009) (AF1). AF methodology has been applied notably in the newly introduced multidimensional poverty index (MPI) for the UNDP‟s 2010 Human Development Report, and other applications include Batana (2008) in Sub-Saharan Africa, Alkire and Seth (2009) in India, Yu (2008) in China, Santos and Ura (2009) in Bhutan, and Battiston et. al. (2009) in Latin America. The MPI Country Briefing series by Alkire and Santos (2010) includes Nepal. The Nepal MEI index is an intuitive and policy-relevant measure that is also technically robust, satisfying a number of desirable properties. MEI contributes to the measurement and understanding of multi dimensional welfare/deprivations in three distinct ways: i) MEI is calculated for eighty different caste/ethnic population groups in the country; ii) it conceptualizes and constructs the level of exclusion for a given social group as a reflection of deprivation opportunities in multiple dimensions of human well being: income, health, education and agency/influence; (iii) unlike the other multidimensional indices such as the HDI and the MPI, the MEI includes direct measures of income and influence dimensions. The details of the indicators and methodology used in the MEI Index are provided in section 3 of the paper.
Publisher:
UNDP
Type / Script:
Progress Report
in
English
Keywords:
SOCIAL GROUPS, ETHNICITY, SOCIAL CLASSES, CASTE, DALITS, SOCIAL STRUCTURE, POVERTY, INEQUALITY, DISCRIMINATION, INCOME, EMPOWERMENT, NUTRITION, HEALTH, EDUCATION, MALNUTRITION
Thematic Group:
UNDP
, (
2011
)
Thesaurus:
14.05.03
-
Social Development
PDF
| File Size:
1.73 MB
Download
Feeder:
LEELASHRESTHA
, Editor:
, Auditor:
...
Making Smaller Social Groups Visible and Providing a Baseline for Tracking Results on Social Inclusion: The Nepal Multidimensional Exclusion Index
Abstract:
This paper presents the methodology and first round results for a Multidimensional Exclusion Index (MEI) for social groups in Nepal. The MEI proposed in this paper provides a summary measure of exclusion (deprivation) in income, health, education and influence/agency dimensions. MEI is constructed using the multidimensional poverty measurement methodology proposed by Alkire and Foster (2007, 2009) (AF1). AF methodology has been applied notably in the newly introduced multidimensional poverty index (MPI) for the UNDP‟s 2010 Human Development Report, and other applications include Batana (2008) in Sub-Saharan Africa, Alkire and Seth (2009) in India, Yu (2008) in China, Santos and Ura (2009) in Bhutan, and Battiston et. al. (2009) in Latin America. The MPI Country Briefing series by Alkire and Santos (2010) includes Nepal. The Nepal MEI index is an intuitive and policy-relevant measure that is also technically robust, satisfying a number of desirable properties. MEI contributes to the measurement and understanding of multi dimensional welfare/deprivations in three distinct ways: i) MEI is calculated for eighty different caste/ethnic population groups in the country; ii) it conceptualizes and constructs the level of exclusion for a given social group as a reflection of deprivation of opportunities in multiple dimensions of human well being: income, health, education and agency/influence; (iii) unlike the other multidimensional indices such as the HDI and the MPI, the MEI includes direct measures of income and influence dimensions. The details of the indicators and methodology used in the MEI Index are provided in section 3 of the paper.
Publisher:
UNDP
Type / Script:
Progress Report
in
English
Keywords:
SOCIAL GROUPS, ETHNICITY, SOCIAL CLASSES, CASTE, DALITS, SOCIAL STRUCTURE, POVERTY, INEQUALITY, DISCRIMINATION, INCOME, EMPOWERMENT, NUTRITION, HEALTH, EDUCATION, MALNUTRITION
Thematic Group:
UNDP
, (
2011
)
Thesaurus:
14.05.03
-
Social Development
PDF
| File Size:
1.73 MB
Download
Feeder:
LEELASHRESTHA
, Editor:
, Auditor:
...
Making Smaller Social Groups Visible and Providing a Baseline for Tracking Results on Social Inclusion: The Nepal Multidimensional Exclusion Index
Abstract:
This paper presents the methodology and first round results for a Multidimensional Exclusion Index (MEI) for social groups in Nepal. The MEI proposed in this paper provides a summary measure of exclusion (deprivation) in income, health, education and influence/agency dimensions. MEI is constructed using the multidimensional poverty measurement methodology proposed by Alkire and Foster (2007, 2009) (AF1). AF methodology has been applied notably in the newly introduced multidimensional poverty index (MPI) for the UNDP‟s 2010 Human Development Report, and other applications include Batana (2008) in Sub-Saharan Africa, Alkire and Seth (2009) in India, Yu (2008) in China, Santos and Ura (2009) in Bhutan, and Battiston et. al. (2009) in Latin America. The MPI Country Briefing series by Alkire and Santos (2010) includes Nepal. The Nepal MEI index is an intuitive and policy-relevant measure that is also technically robust, satisfying a number of desirable properties. MEI contributes to the measurement and understanding of multi dimensional welfare/deprivations in three distinct ways: i) MEI is calculated for eighty different caste/ethnic population groups in the country; ii) it conceptualizes and constructs the level of exclusion for a given social group as a reflection of deprivation of opportunities in multiple dimensions of human well being: income, health, education and agency/influence; (iii) unlike the other multidimensional indices such as the HDI and the MPI, the MEI includes direct measures of income and influence dimensions. The details of the indicators and methodology used in the MEI Index are provided in section 3 of the paper.
Publisher:
UNDP
Type / Script:
Progress Report
in
English
Keywords:
SOCIAL GROUPS, ETHNICITY, SOCIAL CLASSES, CASTE, DALITS, SOCIAL STRUCTURE, POVERTY, INEQUALITY, DISCRIMINATION, INCOME, EMPOWERMENT, NUTRITION, HEALTH, EDUCATION, MALNUTRITION
Thematic Group:
UNDP
, (
2011
)
Thesaurus:
14.05.03
-
Social Development
PDF
| File Size:
1.73 MB
Download
Feeder:
LEELASHRESTHA
, Editor:
, Auditor:
...
Making Smaller Social Groups Visible and Providing a Baseline for Tracking Results on Social Inclusion: The Nepal Multidimensional Exclusion Index
Abstract:
This paper presents the methodology and first round results for a Multidimensional Exclusion Index (MEI) for social groups in Nepal. The MEI proposed in this paper provides a summary measure of exclusion (deprivation) in income, health, education and influence/agency dimensions. MEI is constructed using the multidimensional poverty measurement methodology proposed by Alkire and Foster (2007, 2009) (AF1). AF methodology has been applied notably in the newly introduced multidimensional poverty index (MPI) for the UNDP‟s 2010 Human Development Report, and other applications include Batana (2008) in Sub-Saharan Africa, Alkire and Seth (2009) in India, Yu (2008) in China, Santos and Ura (2009) in Bhutan, and Battiston et. al. (2009) in Latin America. The MPI Country Briefing series by Alkire and Santos (2010) includes Nepal. The Nepal MEI index is an intuitive and policy-relevant measure that is also technically robust, satisfying a number of desirable properties. MEI contributes to the measurement and understanding of multi dimensional welfare/deprivations in three distinct ways: i) MEI is calculated for eighty different caste/ethnic population groups in the country; ii) it conceptualizes and constructs the level of exclusion for a given social group as a reflection of deprivation of opportunities in multiple dimensions of human well being: income, health, education and agency/influence; (iii) unlike the other multidimensional indices such as the HDI and the MPI, the MEI includes direct measures of income and influence dimensions. The details of the indicators and methodology used in the MEI Index are provided in section 3 of the paper.
Publisher:
UNDP
Type / Script:
Progress Report
in
English
Keywords:
SOCIAL GROUPS, ETHNICITY, SOCIAL CLASSES, CASTE, DALITS, SOCIAL STRUCTURE, POVERTY, INEQUALITY, DISCRIMINATION, INCOME, EMPOWERMENT, NUTRITION, HEALTH, EDUCATION, MALNUTRITION
Thematic Group:
UNDP
, (
2011
)
Thesaurus:
14.05.03
-
Social Development
PDF
| File Size:
1.73 MB
Download
Feeder:
LEELASHRESTHA
, Editor:
, Auditor:
...
Making Smaller Social Groups Visible and Providing a Baseline for Tracking Results on Social Inclusion: The Nepal Multidimensional Exclusion Index
Abstract:
This paper presents the methodology and first round results for a Multidimensional Exclusion Index (MEI) for social groups in Nepal. The MEI proposed in this paper provides a summary measure of exclusion (deprivation) in income, health, education and influence/agency dimensions. MEI is constructed using the multidimensional poverty measurement methodology proposed by Alkire and Foster (2007, 2009) (AF1). AF methodology has been applied notably in the newly introduced multidimensional poverty index (MPI) for the UNDP‟s 2010 Human Development Report, and other applications include Batana (2008) in Sub-Saharan Africa, Alkire and Seth (2009) in India, Yu (2008) in China, Santos and Ura (2009) in Bhutan, and Battiston et. al. (2009) in Latin America. The MPI Country Briefing series by Alkire and Santos (2010) includes Nepal. The Nepal MEI index is an intuitive and policy-relevant measure that is also technically robust, satisfying a number of desirable properties. MEI contributes to the measurement and understanding of multi dimensional welfare/deprivations in three distinct ways: i) MEI is calculated for eighty different caste/ethnic population groups in the country; ii) it conceptualizes and constructs the level of exclusion for a given social group as a reflection of deprivation of opportunities in multiple dimensions of human well being: income, health, education and agency/influence; (iii) unlike the other multidimensional indices such as the HDI and the MPI, the MEI includes direct measures of income and influence dimensions. The details of the indicators and methodology used in the MEI Index are provided in section 3 of the paper.
Publisher:
UNDP
Type / Script:
Progress Report
in
English
Keywords:
SOCIAL GROUPS, ETHNICITY, SOCIAL CLASSES, CASTE, DALITS, SOCIAL STRUCTURE, POVERTY, INEQUALITY, DISCRIMINATION, INCOME, EMPOWERMENT, NUTRITION, HEALTH, EDUCATION, MALNUTRITION
Thematic Group:
UNDP
, (
2011
)
Thesaurus:
14.05.03
-
Social Development
PDF
| File Size:
1.73 MB
Download
Feeder:
LEELASHRESTHA
, Editor:
, Auditor:
...
Making Smaller Social Groups Visible and Providing a Baseline for Tracking Results on Social Inclusion: The Nepal Multidimensional Exclusion Index
Abstract:
This paper presents the methodology and first round results for a Multidimensional Exclusion Index (MEI) for social groups in Nepal. The MEI proposed in this paper provides a summary measure of exclusion (deprivation) in income, health, education and influence/agency dimensions. MEI is constructed using the multidimensional poverty measurement methodology proposed by Alkire and Foster (2007, 2009) (AF1). AF methodology has been applied notably in the newly introduced multidimensional poverty index (MPI) for the UNDP‟s 2010 Human Development Report, and other applications include Batana (2008) in Sub-Saharan Africa, Alkire and Seth (2009) in India, Yu (2008) in China, Santos and Ura (2009) in Bhutan, and Battiston et. al. (2009) in Latin America. The MPI Country Briefing series by Alkire and Santos (2010) includes Nepal. The Nepal MEI index is an intuitive and policy-relevant measure that is also technically robust, satisfying a number of desirable properties. MEI contributes to the measurement and understanding of multi dimensional welfare/deprivations in three distinct ways: i) MEI is calculated for eighty different caste/ethnic population groups in the country; ii) it conceptualizes and constructs the level of exclusion for a given social group as a reflection of deprivation of opportunities in multiple dimensions of human well being: income, health, education and agency/influence; (iii) unlike the other multidimensional indices such as the HDI and the MPI, the MEI includes direct measures of income and influence dimensions. The details of the indicators and methodology used in the MEI Index are provided in section 3 of the paper.
Publisher:
UNDP
Type / Script:
Progress Report
in
English
Keywords:
SOCIAL GROUPS, ETHNICITY, SOCIAL CLASSES, CASTE, DALITS, SOCIAL STRUCTURE, POVERTY, INEQUALITY, DISCRIMINATION, INCOME, EMPOWERMENT, NUTRITION, HEALTH, EDUCATION, MALNUTRITION
Thematic Group:
UNDP
, (
2011
)
Thesaurus:
14.05.03
-
Social Development
PDF
| File Size:
1.73 MB
Download
Feeder:
LEELASHRESTHA
, Editor:
, Auditor:
...
Making Smaller Social Groups Visible and Providing a Baseline for Tracking Results on Social Inclusion: The Nepal Multidimensional Exclusion Index
Abstract:
This paper presents the methodology and first round results for a Multidimensional Exclusion Index (MEI) for social groups in Nepal. The MEI proposed in this paper provides a summary measure of exclusion (deprivation) in income, health, education and influence/agency dimensions. MEI is constructed using the multidimensional poverty measurement methodology proposed by Alkire and Foster (2007, 2009) (AF1). AF methodology has been applied notably in the newly introduced multidimensional poverty index (MPI) for the UNDP‟s 2010 Human Development Report, and other applications include Batana (2008) in Sub-Saharan Africa, Alkire and Seth (2009) in India, Yu (2008) in China, Santos and Ura (2009) in Bhutan, and Battiston et. al.(2009) in Latin America. The MPI Country Briefing series by Alkire and Santos (2010) includes Nepal.The Nepal MEI index is an intuitive and policy-relevant measure that is also technically robust, satisfying a number of desirable properties. MEI contributes to the measurement and understanding of multi-dimensional welfare/deprivations in three distinct ways: i) MEI is calculated for eighty different caste/ethnic population groups in the country; ii) it conceptualizes and constructs the level of exclusion for a given social group as a reflection of deprivation of opportunities in multiple dimensions of human well being: income, health, education and agency/influence; (iii) unlike the other multidimensional indices such as the HDI and the MPI, the MEI includes direct measures of income and influence dimensions. The details of the indicators and methodology used in the MEI Index are provided in section 3 of the paper.
Publisher:
UNDP
Type / Script:
Progress Report
in
English
Keywords:
SOCIAL GROUPS, ETHNICITY, SOCIAL CLASSES, CASTE, DALITS, SOCIAL STRUCTURE, POVERTY, INEQUALITY, DISCRIMINATION, INCOME, EMPOWERMENT, NUTRITION, HEALTH, EDUCATION, MALNUTRITION
Thematic Group:
UNDP
, (
2011
)
Thesaurus:
14.05.03
-
Social Development
PDF
| File Size:
1.73 MB
Download
Feeder:
LEELASHRESTHA
, Editor:
, Auditor:
...
Making Smaller Social Groups Visible and Providing a Baseline for Tracking Results on Social Inclusion: The Nepal Multidimensional Exclusion Index
Abstract:
This paper presents the methodology and first round results for a Multidimensional Exclusion Index (MEI) for social groups in Nepal. The MEI proposed in this paper provides a summary measure of exclusion (deprivation) in income, health, education and influence/agency dimensions. MEI is constructed using the multidimensional poverty measurement methodology proposed by Alkire and Foster (2007, 2009) (AF1). AF methodology has been applied notably in the newly introduced multidimensional poverty index (MPI) for the UNDP‟s 2010 Human Development Report, and other applications include Batana (2008) in Sub-Saharan Africa, Alkire and Seth (2009) in India, Yu (2008) in China, Santos and Ura (2009) in Bhutan, and Battiston et. al.(2009) in Latin America. The MPI Country Briefing series by Alkire and Santos (2010) includes Nepal.The Nepal MEI index is an intuitive and policy-relevant measure that is also technically robust, satisfying a number of desirable properties. MEI contributes to the measurement and understanding of multi-dimensional welfare/deprivations in three distinct ways: i) MEI is calculated for eighty different caste/ethnic population groups in the country; ii) it conceptualizes and constructs the level of exclusion for a given social group as a reflection of deprivation of opportunities in multiple dimensions of human well being: income, health, education and agency/influence; (iii) unlike the other multidimensional indices such as the HDI and the MPI, the MEI includes direct measures of income and influence dimensions. The details of the indicators and methodology used in the MEI Index are provided in section 3 of the paper.
Publisher:
UNDP
Type / Script:
Progress Report
in
English
Keywords:
SOCIAL GROUPS, ETHNICITY, SOCIAL CLASSES, CASTE, DALITS, SOCIAL STRUCTURE, POVERTY, INEQUALITY, DISCRIMINATION, INCOME, EMPOWERMENT, NUTRITION, HEALTH, EDUCATION, MALNUTRITION
Thematic Group:
UNDP
, (
2011
)
Thesaurus:
14.05.03
-
Social Development
PDF
| File Size:
1.73 MB
Download
Feeder:
LEELASHRESTHA
, Editor:
, Auditor:
...