As WUPAP moves from Phase II to III, the following sections reflects on some of the main lessons to be drawn from the implementation of the project to date. It reviews the five key lessons registered in the Joint Review Mission: 4-23 April 2012- Supervision Mission Report and make sure that the Phase III design answers to these issues. The design of the Phase III has an approach more based on the community level. The main objective is the empowerment of the community. The implementation of the activities’ process is very different. A fund is given to the cluster from project. Then the communities can freely decide how to use the fund. In consequence the activities will answer to their priority needs and will be more efficient. The community is free to select activities they want, modalities of implementation and the service providers to realize it. The community is the only decision maker. It ensures that the priorities of the beneficiaries are the basis for planning the delivery of services. In another hand the project will not work through the government representatives. The project’s procedure works without line agencies. Indeed decentralization process in has not been efficient and it is preferable for the quality of the project to use different way giving directly the money to the cluster to select external providers either from public or private sector.
|
Publisher:
IFAD
,
(2013
) |
Type / Script:
Progress Report
in English
|
Keywords:
PROJECT FUND, AID FINANCING, CORE OF PROJECT, SYNERGY OF PROJECTS, EFFICIENT AND EFFECTIVE, QUALITY ASSURANCE, NEW INFRASTRUCTURE, INNOVATION, EMPOWERMENT PROCESS, SERVICE DELIVERY MECHANISM, COMMUNITY INVESTMENT PLAN, DEVELOPMENT FINANCE, ACCOUNTABILITY, PERFORMANCE DELIVERY
|
Thematic Group:
IFAD
:
International Fund for Agricultural Development
|
Thesaurus:
18.04.00
- Financing
|
Reference Link:
|
|
|
** This document has been:
713
times viewed
4
times downloaded. Feeder:
DEEPIKA DHAKAL
, Editor:
ALISHA THAPALIYA
, Auditor:
View Document History
|
|
|
|
|